A few things I've seen lately:

1. Haywire
I'm not sure why this movie failed at the box office (rotten tomatoes: 80% of critics liked it but only 43% of the public). It was the best action movie I've seen and a pretty damn good just as a movie.

Things I liked:
-Brilliant use of sound, most notably the absence of sound. There were fights during which all you could hear was the noises and it made the scenes much more intense and interestingly intimate. In one part she's telling a story and the flashback has no dialogue. None from the characters in the scene and I don't think much, if any, voice-over. It's all pictures. I heart it.
-Realistic fight scenes. Not balletic, not beautiful, but convincing in a "this is how I would survive in as efficient a way as possible using whatever methods were at my disposal". They were messy and direct. She also fought "like a girl" meaning using her strengths to her advantages (my thighs are stronger than my arms too).
-Character development. I liked that the main character didn't talk much. She's a freaking assassin/special ops kinda person, why would she be chatty? Yet while being incredibly independent and (necessarily) ruthless she also maintained some normal (restrained, but normal) emotional and/or romantic relationships. Without it being cliched and ridiculous and sappy and sentimental. I don't think I've seen many female characters granted this level of respect. Also props to the actress who I believe was a fighter who crossed over into acting.
-She screwed up. While being incredibly competent (god so hot) and confident (also hot) sometimes things didn't go to plan and she couldn't outrun all 85 guys chasing her. And she would do smart, savvy things that made sense for the character. The writing was really smart.
-A subtle plot. Not everything was revealed at once! It didn't treat the audience like we're stupid! (Maybe this is why people didn't like it?) You had to pay attention and maybe think a little! There was some exposition at the end, but also blanks you had to fill in yourself *gasp*

I went in expecting a fairly entertaining, fun action movie and was very impressed. I doubt it's still in theaters, but would *highly* recommend. (If you saw it and didn't like it, I'm really curious to know why.)

2. A few nights later I watched a documentary on war photographer James Nachtwey. (Google him!) We have some of his photographs at work and they are often used for teaching. My boss lent me the movie, it was made about 10 years ago. It was fascinating to learn about this man who has devoted his life (at the cost of a fixed personal life) to his work and to bringing attention to devastating events worldwide. But 90 minutes of war in Bosnia, Rwanda, Palestine, Guatemala, etc., and images of incredibly poverty from Africa and southeast Asia, people living in trash heaps and next to railroad tracks, and starving children. It was rough going. One of his photographs can be incredibly moving so seeing film of so many of these situations was intense. It was a lot of human suffering to witness, even at such a remove. You may know some of his work--it was his images of 911 that were published in TIME.

3. This week I went to a talk by the Guerrilla Girls. (Well, one Girl). Feminist, activist artists who dubbed themselves "the conscience of the art world," they've been creating public works of art (mostly posters, stickers, and banners) that challenge sexism and racism in the art world since 1985. They wear gorilla masks and adopt the names of dead women artists to hide their identities. By the time I was in school they were already canonized (I've taught them in intro classes), so it was fun to see one of them present in person. My exhibition includes some of their posters and I tagged along the tour we gave Frida Kahlo this morning.
Tags:
Saturday I went to see the new extended edition of Metropolis. The score was played live by the Alloy orchestra. It was awesome! I took my parents and they seemed to like it a fair amount, more than I expected.

the complete restoration to date of German director Fritz Lang’s 1927 science-fiction classic, METROPOLIS. Lang’s visionary work of science fiction redefined the term “super-production,” with its thousands of extras, monstrous sets, and eye-popping special effects, including a cataclysmic, multitude-engulfing flood. Lang’s original conception was only seen by the very earliest Berlin audiences (“positively overwhelming,” raved Variety after the 1927 premiere) — and then the cutting began, followed by decades of attempts at reconstruction. A 1984 version ran only 87 minutes, while the then-“definitive” 2002 reconstruction edged up the running time to 124 minutes. Finally, in 2008, the Museo del Cine in Buenos Aires came across a print that had been in an Argentinean private collection since 1928. At a private screening in Berlin, “the room got very quiet,” as the select audience witnessed over a thousand shots that were thought lost — bringing the running time to 153 minutes and virtually matching the original shooting script and musical cues. This astounding new version — after considerable restoration work on the well-worn archival print — has been combined with the visually superb 2002 restoration. Presented in HD, audiences can, at long last, experience Lang’s original METROPOLIS as the director intended it to be seen.

Today I'm going on a tour Frank Stella is giving of his new exhibition!
Tags:
The directors of the Indianapolis Museum of Art (Max Anderson) and the New Orleans Museum of Art (John Bullard) are betting masterpieces on who will win the Super Bowl.

sample:
"Max Anderson must not really believe the Colts can beat the Saints in the Super Bowl. Otherwise why would he bet such an insignificant work as the Ingrid Calame painting? Let's up the ante. The New Orleans Museum of Art will bet the three-month loan of its $4 million Renoir painting, Seamstress at Window, circa 1908, which is currently in the big Renoir exhibition in Paris. What will Max wager of equal importance? Go Saints!"

It goes on from there. Follow it here.

I was at a dinner with Max Anderson when I worked at the Hood (he was director of the Whitney then) and am unsurprised.

Love that the museums are showing their community pride!
Tags:
My two-cents on the deeply offensive on so many levels (mysognistic, homophoboic, anti-science, anti-integrity, there are about a million more I missed) survey that's been going around.

The deep stupidity and offensiveness has been amply documented with more eloquence and patience than I have elsewhere. link spam here

Just want to chime with a little perspective from my own academic field (although my period is the 20th c., not the Renaissance). I posted this in ellen_fremedon's journal but want it here for my own reference.

Can I just say that the whole Mona Lisa example [that ogi-ogas uses to explain his research and explain how one draws conclusions about the brain from experiential data] pisses me the hell off!

From ogi-ogas: "The Mona Lisa smile is often characterized as "enigmatic." Why? Because when you look directly at the smile, it appears she's not smiling. When you look to her side, she does appear smiling."

Really? Because I look at her and see that she's smiling, but not grinning. Is that so complicated? Who has often characterized her smile as "enigmatic"? Citation? (To be fair, there are some.) Want another reason why that may be? Or at least other contributing factors? Let's try culture.

The "enigmatic smile" meme has cultural roots, although relatively shallow ones. It emerged with romanticism in the 19th c., for *hundreds of years* before that the painting was praised for its fidelity to reality and she was described as smiling, full stop.

"And in this picture of Leonardo's, there was a smile so pleasing, that the sight of it was a thing more divine than human; and it was held to be a marvel, in that it was not other than alive"* --Vasari 1550 (The earliest description, to be fair, Vasari probably hadn't even seen the painting when he described it but he is/was so famous that everyone reads/read him and he influences a lot of later art criticism).

Nothing enigmatic. Then in the 19th c. we get the romantic writers and all the flowery descriptions. Did our brains evolve to see enigmatic smiles in the 19th century?

How many of us heard about the "enigmatic smile" before we'd ever even seen a reproduction of the Mona Lisa. Do you think that influenced how we visually interpreted her expression? Maybe a little? Not that cultural expectations can contribute to things that are so "obvious" and "natural" like how women express their sexuality.

Even visual perception and interpretation isn't clear cut, never mind something as complex as sexuality.

*Quoted in Mona Lisa, by Kenneth Clark The Burlington Magazine © 1973, p. 145
Tags:
I've been working on this for a while...

In case you missed it photos and video of the Leverage cast and Jensen Ackles celebrating Christian Kane's birthday at one of his shows. Oh happy. (Link from [personal profile] hederahelix).

[personal profile] aerye gave me 5 words last week. Let's see if we can make some progress on those. If you would like 5 words let me know.
Beauty, food, strength, art, humor )
Tags:
Take a look at this post comparing reproductions of fine art with the originals.

Make sure to read the followup. I agree that there is no conspiracy it's just the modelers making adjustments based on it "not looking quite right". They're creating commercial products and that is greatly affected by contemporary beauty standards.

---
How to Watch Football is pretty much exactly how I watched the superbowl at S. and J.'s this year (except with added DVR!).
Tags:
Busy busy weekend cut-tagged for your convenience.

Friday night D. and I went to see Iron Man.

Non-to-very-mildly-spoilery thoughts )

Saturday I decided to drive to New Haven.

Back in 2004 I interned for a curator at WCMA who was working on a show about Gerald and Sarah Murphy. They were a wealthy American couple who entertained a lot of famous artists and authors in France during the 20s (think Hemingway, the Picassos, Dos Passos, Dorothy Parker, Fernand Leger, the Fitzgeralds). They inspired characters (the Divers in Tender is the Night) and created a social convivial atmosphere that seemed incredibly awesome (until they lost a bunch of money in '29 and their 2 sons died). Gerald was a modern painter (imagine Picasso giving you painting tips) and his 7 surviving canvases were brought together for this show.

The exhibition opened last fall in Williamstown. I missed it, but I knew it was coming to Yale this spring before going to Dallas this summer. Well Sunday was its last day at Yale and since it seemed unlikely I'd make it to Dallas I decided to drive up to New Haven.

some lists of awesome things )

Unrelated, but also I've been watching Angel (for the first time) the last few months. Condensed thoughts )

Misc. awesome things:
-met with my adviser today, his notes on my latest dissertation proposal draft were more editing than anything else so I should be able to turn the final into my committee tomorrow
-finally have my proposal defense schedule (with a room and a projector and everything) for next week
-found a fellowship to apply for to study in Romania next spring (cross your fingers for me)
-making enchiladas for the first time, smells good so far, we'll see
-going to MCR concert in Philly tomorrow with [livejournal.com profile] bayleaf and friends!!
-bellydance class tonight
abka: painting of daffodils and pear (Default)
( Nov. 12th, 2007 12:24 pm)
Friday I made a quick trip to see the Turner show at the National Gallery. If you're in town before early January I would recommend seeing it, it's pretty spectacular. Turner is great if you want to see an artist's work shift from clear, descriptive scenes, to an expression of atmosphere and light so thick the canvases look almost completely abstract. (For those of you who came on last week's art tour, Rothko has some Turner echoes.) I also stopped by the NGA offices to deliver thank-you cupcakes to G. and M. who ran a comps dry run for me.

Saturday [livejournal.com profile] afrikate and I went out in the U street corridor. It was fun, [livejournal.com profile] afrikate danced with a very enthusiastic older man. We found a place with good music although quickly realized we were not in the going out uniform. (It's evolved since we were in college.) By the second place our mission had become an anthropological study of the young 'uns and their fashion choices.

The rest of my weekend was spent grading papers, trying to finally shake this headcold, and hanging out with D. who's having a worse time with the same cold.
Tags:
abka: painting of daffodils and pear (Default)
( Nov. 4th, 2007 11:26 am)
The weekend has been a mix of awesome and not-so-great.

Friday's curling was tons of fun until a new curler had a bad accident toward the end. [livejournal.com profile] darthfox and I ended up staying with her at the hospital until 3am. [livejournal.com profile] darthfox has posted more details here. Fortunately she is doing better. They moved her to Washington Medical Center and if she's not home by now, she will probably be going home soon, and her memory's returning.

Saturday was lovely. Thanks to everyone who came to the National Gallery and let me chatter on about the art for hours and hours. We spent almost 3 hours covering the 20th c. in the East building then after a quick break did about a half hour in the Dutch and Flemish galleries.

Then [livejournal.com profile] sanj, [livejournal.com profile] ellen_fremedon, [livejournal.com profile] darthfox, and I went out to dinner and shopping fun time. I bought some desperately needed new brown heels for work and a cute gray sweater.

Unfortunately after only 4 hours sleep and waking up with a brutal headcold I was done pretty early in the evening. Today I am taking a couch day, hanging out with D. and babying the cold. Monday D. booked me a massage so I will be happy and relaxed for exams on Tuesday.

I've never had a massage before. Will I be able to enjoy it with the headcold? Should I reschedule? Or might it help? Thoughts?
Tags:
Times review of my adviser's exhibition “Graphic Modernism From the Baltic to the Balkans, 1910-1935” at the New York Public Library here. If you're in the city you should check it out. This is the stuff I work on. These journals are rarely exhibited and this rich, concise exhibition is a great introduction. It's in one small room and even the juxtaposition between the marble walls and the modern graphics is striking.
abka: painting of daffodils and pear (Default)
( Jun. 20th, 2007 08:58 am)
This is very cute. Thanks to grumph for the link.
Tags:
abka: painting of daffodils and pear (Default)
( May. 19th, 2007 01:25 pm)
If you're local and looking for something to do this weekend I highly recommend Moving Pictures at the Phillips Collection. The curator look at how early film and pictures influenced each other. Flat screens with early films are hung next to paintings, drawings, and prints from the first decades of the 20th c. It's awesome and the last day is Sunday (tomorrow).
Tags:
.

Profile

abka: painting of daffodils and pear (Default)
Amelia

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags