Did you read the link I posted in my comment above? I think it changes things quite considerably. I'm still not sure it's a great idea, but at least the expressed intentions are nowhere near as sinister as the original wording of the bill made it out to be, and it sounds like he's working on getting it changed to be much better defined.
Yeah, I read that after I posted. I thought at least that the legislator's letter was very thoughtful, and I'm heartened that he intends to change the wording of the bill (which to me was very suggestive of miscarriages and abortions being included - I've never heard a baby referred to as a 'product of conception').
From:
no subject
From:
no subject