(As is so often the case, I'm generally up to date on reading my DW circle, but not doing at all well with commenting.)
I guess at this point we're well into the liminal last bit of the year. (I said to scruloose earlier that I still try to hold "Christmas is twelve days, dammit" in my heart, but it's hard, especially when our observance of the the holiday at all is so low-key.) We had masked visits with both sets of parents (mine on Christmas Eve and scruloose's on Boxing Day), and in between, Christmas Day was just the two of us and the cats and the Netflix fireplaces. My mom sent us home with Christmas stockings and some gifts (also very low-key; we still keep nudging for just not doing presents at all), and the latter included a hard copy of the most recent edition of Garner's Modern English Usage, which was a delightful surprise.
We actually had a white Christmas, which has never been a sure thing and is getting rarer and rarer at terrible speeds, but now ice and rain are arriving, to be followed by a cold snap, so I'm really glad we don't need to leave the house anytime soon. (See also: will we lose power? Very possibly! >.< But we're pretty well-equipped to deal with it.) I'm feeling like I should be looking ahead or setting small goals or trying to find specific things I want to focus on, but so far I'm not really scrounging the brain for it. Anyone want to tell me about how you're approaching it?
(I do think I'll sign up for a GYWO wordcount goal again, despite having written almost literally zero words this year, but at this point I have the grim suspicion that the words may stay gone until a new full-on fannish obsession hits me, and that's so infrequent for me. ;_; I have so manyGuardian WIPs and fragments. [And while I'm enjoying seeing all the fannish glee over Heated Rivalry, I don't currently feel fannish about it myself {which, honestly, I'm okay with}.]) Recent media, mostly books: All Is Bright, Llinos Cathryn Thomas' "read over Advent" novella, which was lovely; The Dark is Rising (book), which I'm glad to have finally read; I don't know if/when I might read the books that follow it; Snake-Eater by T. Kingfisher; Widdershins by Jordan L. Hawk; KJ Charles' Masters in this Hall (which I should've checked the series info about first, as it's the third Lilywhite Boys book and I haven't read the second. Oops); and Brigid Kemmerer's A Curse So Dark and Lonely.
scruloose and I finished listening to System Collapse, so we're out of Murderbot books. Yesterday (?) we listened to the four-minute audiobook sample of The Thief, which I might be able to work with? But wow, the voice sounds so much older than Gen to me. (Also, Kobo, four minutes is a reasonable sample length, but it literally cuts off mid-word.)
I watched the season finale of Heated Rivalry pretty promptly on Friday morning, for fear of being spoiled, which meant scruloose, who hadn't seen any of the show previously, pretty much watched it too while feeding the cats and having their own breakfast. (I did give them some background info first.) As noted above: not feeling fannish, but I thought that was really well done overall, and the actors seem like an absolute delight.
And we've watched two movies since starting vacation (Wake Up Dead Man and Sinners), which brings me up to a whopping four [4] movies this year.
An all-new Burning Wheel Bundle presenting The Burning Wheel, the medieval-themed tabletop fantasy roleplaying game about vibrant, dynamic characters whose beliefs propel the story.
People talk about this like it's so shocking, or like it means your pet obviously doesn't really love you, but c'mon. I love my cat, but I'd eat her in a heartbeat if she was already dead and there was nothing else left. She's my cat, she's not my baby. It's not like I've gone full on Donner Party - and let's be clear, if that was all that was left on the table, and they were already dead, I'd do that too. At least, I'd think about doing it. I suppose I might not be able to bring myself to go that far, but I wouldn't find it shocking if another person did!
If you go to my journal you will find recs for stories in the following fandoms:
Puck of Pook's Hill/Callendar Series Sussex Set Swallows and Amazons (two stories) Cadfael Chronicles Chalet School The Secret Garden and Dragonriders of Pern
Since we met in 1977, MyGuy has always eaten the spongy white stuff which dwells between an orange and its skin (whether he picks it off the whole peeled orange or nibbles it away from the cut-open peel).
The Queen's Embroiderer: A True Story of Paris, Lovers, Swindlers, and the First Stock Market Crisis did quite a good job of giving me historical context around the lives of artisans and upwardly mobile bourgeois in 17th and early 18th century France and only a mediocre job IMO of convincing me of its central argument, but I was reading it for the former and not the latter so I can't say I was disappointed per se ...
As the author, historian Joan DeJean, introduces her narrative, she was browsing the National Archives when she came across two documents: the first, appointing Jean Magoulet as official embroiderer to Queen Marie-Thérèse of France; the second, decreeing that Magoulet's daughter Marie Louise should be put in prison and deported to New Orleans on charges of prostitution. DeJean immediately dropped what she was doing to Get To The Bottom Of This and went on a deep dive into the entire Magoulet family as well as the family of Louis Chevrot, the young man whose involvement with Marie-Louise resulted in the charges above.
In order to write this family saga, Joan DeJean has pulled out every relevant family document -- marriage licenses, birth certificates, guardianship statements, criminal charges, recorded purchases, etc. etc. -- and she does a clear and interesting job of explaining what we can learn from them, what these kinds of documents normally look like and what their context is, what the specific features of these family documents imply, and letting you follow her logic with your own brain. I appreciate this very much! I had no idea, for example, that it was standard in 17th-century France for the court to appoint a guardian for any child who lost a parent, even if they still had the other parent living, to ensure that their financial interests were protected, something that came up often in this narrative where a lot of kids were losing parents in situations where their financial interests were not particularly protected. It's a really good example of historical detective work, how you can draw a picture of a family through time through the bureaucratic litter they leave behind, and I appreciated it very much.
On the other hand, Joan DeJean also occasionally slips into writing like this --
In the course of their attempts both to get rich quick and to save their skin when they got into bad straits, the Queen's Embroiderers became imposters, tricksters, con artists nonpareil. They lied about everything and to everyone: to the police, to notaries, to their in-laws. They lied about their ages and those of their children, about their professional accomplishments and their net worth. They caroused; they philandered; they made a mockery of the laws of church and state. The only truly authentic thing about them was their extraordinary talent and their ability to weave gold and silver thread into the kind of garments that seemed the stuff of dreams. In their lives and on an almost daily basis, haute couture crossed paths with high crime.
Savage beauty indeed.
-- which made me laugh out loud every time it happened. So, bug, feature? who could say ....
Anyway, Joan DeJean makes a pretty good argument for most of the family gossip she pulls out about the Magoulets and the Chevrots, but the center of her argument about the Great Tragic Romance between Marie-Louise Magoulet and Louis Chevrot rests on a really elaborate switcheroo that I simply do not buy. In drawing out her family saga, DeJean has become obsessed with the fact that there seem to have been two Marie-Louise Magoulets, one being more than a decade older than the other, and, crucially, also more than a decade older than Louis Chevrot; ( I guess this is technically spoilers for a three hundred year old scandal )
But a.) context about material culture and craftsmanship is what I was here for and context is what I got, in spades, and b.) if you're going to invent a historical conspiracy theory, make it as niche as possible, is what I say, so despite the fact that I don't BELIEVE DeJean I still spiritually support her. Has she perhaps connected a few more dots than actually exist? Perhaps. But I still certainly got my money's worth [none; library] out of the book!
ask a detailed question about phonology, such as "Do you really pronounce 'tr' as 'chr'?" (Yes, yes we do. We all do. It's almost impossible not to due to the physiology of those phonemes.)
And this will generate a burst of absolutely, frustratingly useless nonsense, because people just do not know how they talk. They don't know how they talk, they can't analyze their phonetics on the fly, and they are staggeringly unaware of these facts.
I keep telling these people to go to /r/linguistics instead, but thus far, nobody has taken my advice. Which is a pity, because I do give excellent advice, especially in this case.
But seriously - nobody knows how they talk. It's like trying to explain the biomechanics of walking. Sure, you've been doing it since you were a toddler (probably?), but that doesn't mean you have any understanding at all of what the hell you're doing as you propel yourself from place to place. I bet you can't even explain how you adjust for your varying center of balance!
Purrcy finds a little taste from the bathroom faucet is one of the finest of vintages worth one of the cutest of bleps.
Purrcy was settling down to nap just where the precious, slanting rays of winter sun crossed the bed. Savoring every one.
We celebrated Dirk's 70th birthday early, on Tuesday (because that's when E&P could come), and this time we plotted to give him Major Presents:
- E&P got him a DVD/blu-ray player (plus cords) - I got DVD or blu-ray sets of all New-Who Doctors
Take THAT! Disney/BBC, which have between them ensured that no New Era Doctor Who (except Gatwa) has been available to stream outside the UK for months running now, leaving his money just sitting there on the table, and have now contrived to *lose it forever* because he's never going to pay to stream it again. Also, the sets turn out to have all kinds of extra material he's never seen before, he's super happy.
Disney continues to shoot themselves in the foot inexplicably: the Doctor Who spin-off The War Between the Land and the Sea just finished in the UK where it got really high ratings, Disney has the rights in the US, they haven't shown it & haven't said when they will. Dirk is very respectful of IP generally speaking, but I've DLed the eps via UK friends and am just waiting for him to snap and say Fuck Disney.
Beth decided she didn't want to go in on the big Doctor Who present, she bought him a trilobite fossil to keep on his desk. Excellent choice, also made him super happy and feeling very Time Lord-y as he plays with it while watching Doctor Who commentary during work breaks.
We don't really give presents anymore, because it stresses me out so much: it always took so much of my time and mental energy through the fall, it always made me very anxious, the payoff just wasn't worth it because I couldn't relax completely when enough to appreciate what I was given. Dirk's happiness this time *almost* makes me want to reconsider ... almost.
My brother came Christmas afternoon, had a simple dinner with us, hung around and chatted on Friday, ended up sleeping on our sofa instead of at his nearby hotel because the roads were so icy by 6:30. We didn't get the weight of snow we'd been expecting, but the ice was BAD. Fortunately his drive back to NYC in the late morning was OK. And now the temperature is on a steady rise and everything will wash away tomorrow.
This is your check-in post for today. The poll will be open from midnight Universal or Zulu Time (8pm Eastern Time) on Sunday, December 28, to midnight on Monday, December 29 (8pm Eastern Time).
The one problem I have with Roxanne is, alas, its central premise: that its protagonist, Charlie “C.D.” Bales (Steve Martin) is tragically undesirable because of his unusually long nose. C.D. is a pillar of the community with a steady and useful job, is well-read and cultured, empathetic and funny, kind to all, loved by his many friends and neighbors, and he owns a house. A nice one! In a town where the property values are clearly outrageous! That he is undatable because of his nose stretches credulity, not only back in 1987, when this film was made, but especially here in 2025, where a single, available, gainfully-employed and psychologically-undamaged middle-aged man would be snatched right off the sidewalk in front of his absolutely ridiculously cozy and well-appointed home. You can’t tell me otherwise. He’s the whole package. With a little extra!
Be that as it may, we are asked to accept that this updating of Cyrano de Bergerac is not lying to us, and that C.D., despite all this other advantages, is admired but lonely. This being the 1980s, not the 1640s when the original tale was set, we are told that C.D. has a serious, possibly deadly, allergic reaction to anesthesia, a fact which has put him into a coma before. This is great for patching up an obvious plot hole, but does mean it must suck for him to have regular dental care. C.D. is trapped with his nose, and seems resigned to it and tries to live with it with some amount of acceptance… unless someone tries to use it to make fun of him.
Then! Roxanne! For every Cyrano must have a Roxanne, even if the number of “n”s in her name is variable. This Roxane is Roxanne Kowalski, an astronomer who has come to C.D.’s ski town of Nelson (and actually shot in a ski town called Nelson, but in Canada, not the USA, where this film takes place). She’s in town for the clear skies to help her locate a comet. C.D. takes a shine to her, not only because she looks like Daryl Hannah, but because she’s smart, and is the only person in town besides him to traffic in sarcasm. The townsfolk of Nelson are lovely, but wit and wordplay are not exactly their thing.
Now arrives Chris (Rick Rossovich), the deeply hunky and handsome professional firefighter that Fire Chief C.D. brings into town to help train his hapless volunteer crew. Chris and Roxanne spy each other from across a crowded bar, she smiles and he… goes to hurl in the bathroom, because the idea of talking to women gives him a panic attack. Roxanne confesses her liking of Chris to C.D., who is crushed but wants her to be happy, intercedes on her behalf with Chris and, as the strictures of this tale require, starts feeding Chris the words that will woo Roxanne. Complications ensue, as they would.
I take it back, I have another problem with Roxanne, although this is with the tale of Cyrano in general, and a persistent feature across its many tellings. Which is that Roxanne, especially in this telling, where she is both a scientist and someone with social aptitude, would not be able to parse out the fact that Chris, who is a nice guy but mostly has well-marbled beef between his ears, is not the author of the letters and speeches that capture her sapiosexual heart. I mean, okay, I get it, horniness is a hell of a drug, but even so. The disconnect between Chris and “his” letters is a lot.
I’m willing to go with it because it means we get Steve Martin’s performance, which offers up a masterclass in having one’s heart break with a smile, and showing grace (up to a point) with people who offer none themselves. One of the highlights of the film, early-ish on, is when a boor in a bar calls C.D. “Big Nose.” Rather than take the bait, C.D. shows him up by offering a stack of much wittier insults the man could have offered. It takes skill, and guts, to humiliate someone by offering him all the better ways he could have humiliated you, and to do it in a whole bar full of people. It also takes skill to write the scene in a way that works. Martin, as the screenwriter, pulls it off.
This was the part of Martin’s career where he was doing smarter-than-average guys who held back heartbreak with melancholy humor. As a writer he’d follow up Roxanne a couple of years later with LA Story, another favorite of mine, where he played a similar character, albeit with a smaller nose, in a film with a somewhat more farcical tone. This is actually my favorite part of his career, when he became a somewhat improbably romantic leading man, and while it wouldn’t last, I enjoyed it while it did. I wasn’t the only one, as Martin found himself with a WGA award for Roxanne, in the category of adapted screenplay (I could have sworn he was also nominated for an Oscar for this script, and even wrote that down before doublechecking. He was robbed!).
The film centers on the character of C.D., and secondarily on the love triangle between him, Roxanne and Chris, but this film is also an ensemble film, and this ensemble nature is the one thing that I think elevates it, and gives the film lots of opportunities for grace notes and filling in of character. I’m telling you here that C.D. is well-loved by friends and neighbors, but the film simply shows it, unspooling fun little scenes that give you those details. This is another important point about C.D.’s character: He may be the only practitioner of sarcasm in Nelson, but he’s not cruel to, or bitter at, the rest of the town, which does not share his enthusiasm or facility for it. He is a good person, and worthy of love.
(And as the two other legs of the romantic triangle, Hannah and Rossovich are… fine! Hannah gets good lines and delivers them well. You can believe C.D. appreciates Roxanne’s whole package of person, not just the parts that look like a supermodel. Rossovich is also convincing as a lunk who is very good at his job and very bad at peopling. It’s important to note that Chris isn’t stupid — he knows what he knows and knows it well. One of the things he knows is that he’s not weapons-grade intelligent, like C.D. and Roxanne are. It’s also pretty clear he wouldn’t want to be.)
The original Cyrano de Bergerac (spoiler) does not exactly end on a happy note. Martin knows, as a writer and an actor, that his version is meant to be a romantic comedy, and so (spoiler) his version deviates from the original in significant ways. Martin is neither the first nor last filmmaker to have his adaptation swerve for the dictates of the market. He does it in a way that makes sense for the story he tells, and, importantly, gives agency for the resolution of the story to the right person. It ends well, even if Edmond Rostand, who wrote the original, might have notes.
For those who don’t know, Cyrano de Bergerac was an actual person, a noted soldier, raconteur and writer, who wrote some of the earliest work that could be identified as science fictional, including L’Autre Monde: ou les États et Empires de la Lune, published after his death. He did have a cousin Roxane, who married a Baron Christian of Neuvillette. There was no actual romantic triangle between the three of them. He did by all reports have a large nose, although probably not so large as the one attributed to him by both Rostand and Martin. It was unlikely that Cyrano’s nose kept him unavailable for amorous encounters; he was associated with noted libertines of his time.
Title/Link: Why one small American town won’t stop stoning its residents to death Fandom(s): The Lottery - Shirley Jackson/The New Yorker RPF Character(s): Isaac Chotiner, Mr. Summers Words: 1,082 Summary: The picturesque village of Buell, Maine is one of the last in the United States to continue the tradition of the “harvest” or “prosperity” lottery. Its residents insist the lottery makes them stronger, even as condemnation from outsiders grows.
This is a terrific fic in which Isaac Chotiner interviews the guy who runs the lottery in Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery".
Five days left until Purimgifts 2026 signups open, which means today's countdown banner comes from 2021! Background only today, to avoid causing any date confusion, but it's still one of my favorites from our collection of past banners.
SIGNUPS & NOMINATIONS 2-9 Jan (anywhere in the world) DEADLINE 23 Feb (anywhere in the world) REVEALS 2-4 March
Quick post to say that stories are being posted at hlh_shortcuts! go check them out! So many good stories, with more being posted through the 31st, I think. Reveals go live on Jan 5. I bet everyone can guess which story I wrote haha.
This year, I got a very fun post-Bordeaux double-quickening story, with lots of pining and humor.
Destinations (18378 words) by Anonymous Chapters: 5/5 Fandom: Highlander: The Series Rating: Mature Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply Relationships: Duncan MacLeod/Methos (Highlander), Connor MacLeod & Methos (Highlander) Characters: Duncan MacLeod, Methos (Highlander), Connor MacLeod, Joe Dawson, Amanda, Richie Ryan, Hugh Fitzcairn, Rebecca Horne, Darius (Highlander) Additional Tags: Alternate Universe - Canon Divergence, Slow Romance, Friendship, Explicit Language, During Canon Summary:
The double quickening at Bordeaux has unexpected side effects. It take years for Duncan and Methos to come to terms with what it means for their relationship. It take years for them to understand all the implications. Connor and Methos hang out. They listen to music and talk a lot.